I am Second: faith and football when the Oklahoma Sooners and Texas Longhorns Play on Saturday

Well it is time once again for the Red River Rivalry. But more important to each starting quarterback, Sam Bradford and Colt McCoy, is their faith in Jesus Christ and the influence for him that they can have.

Here is a video of them sharing their story at I am Second. Like Tim Tebow of Florida, these guys are trying to live their lives for Christ in the unique spotlight of elite college football. My hats off to them all for trying to think Christianly about the opportunities and challenges they find themselves with. (click here)

oh yea, I almost forgot…BOOMER SOONER 🙂

What we can expect from God

“And I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the saints, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge—that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God. Now to him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever and ever! Amen.”–Ephesians 3:17-21

That is good news and is always available.

Is Ardi Another Missing Link?

It’s the biggest find in the history of human kind…except when it isn’t. By now in our age of media sensationalism we have learned how things work (especially in controversial areas). Page 1 Headline – the Missing link has been found or find out about the “real historical Jesus” (see the book deal, the movie, and the shiny new website for more details). Then a week or two later when public scrutiny and popular / scholarly peer review take place, things don’t seem quite so conclusive or shiny – page 26 retraction /clarification (but who reads page 26 any more?)

This seems to be the case with Ardi. Granted, not quite the media fiasco of Ida, but the dust is starting to settle and the cracks are beginning to show. Melinda Penner of Stand to Reason has an excellent blog post on Ardi – Read “Ardi Reveals More Than They Think”

Leading Darwinist Richard Dawkins Dodges Debates, Refuses to Defend Evolution as The Greatest Show On Earth

(HT to Evolution News)
“Richard Dawkins, the world’s leading public spokesman for Darwinian evolution and an advocate of the “new atheism,” has refused to debate Dr. Stephen C. Meyer, a prominent advocate of intelligent design and the author of the acclaimed Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design.

“Richard Dawkins claims that the appearance of design in biology is an illusion and claims to have refuted the case for intelligent design,” says Dr. Meyer who received his Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge in England.

“But Dawkins assiduously avoids addressing the key evidence for intelligent design and won’t debate its leading proponents,” adds Dr. Meyer. “Dawkins says that there is no evidence for intelligent design in life, and yet he also acknowledges that neither he nor anyone else has an evolutionary explanation for the origin of the first living cell. We know now even the simplest forms of life are chock-full of digital code, complex information processing systems and other exquisite forms of nanotechnology.”

In Signature in the Cell, Dr. Meyer shows that the digital code embedded in DNA points powerfully to a designing intelligence and helps unravel a mystery that Darwin did not address: how did the very first life begin?

Signature in the Cell has just entered its third printing according to publisher HarperOne, an imprint of Harper Collins, and has been endorsed by scientists around the world, including leading British geneticist Dr. Norman Nevin, Alastair Noble, Ph.D. chemistry, formerly Her Majesty’s Inspector of Schools for Science, Scotland, and Dr. Philip Skell, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

Dr. Meyer challenged Dawkins to a debate when he saw that their speaking tours would cross paths this fall in Seattle and New York. Dawkins declined through his publicists, saying he does not debate “creationists.”

“Dawkins’ response is disingenuous,” said Meyer. “Creationists believe the earth is 10,000 years old and use the Bible as the basis for their views on the origins of life. I don’t think the earth is 10,000 years old and my case for intelligent design is based on scientific evidence.”

According to Discovery Institute, where Dr. Meyer directs the Center for Science & Culture, the debate challenge is a standing invitation for any time and place that is mutually agreeable to both participants.”

Dawkins has also avoiding debating William Lane Craig too. That’s a shame.

Are Scientists Open to Criticism? Are Any of Us?

Science is open to criticism…right? David Berlenski, author of the Devil’s Delusion: Atheism’s Scientific Pretensions is not so sure…

Actually we discover that all of us don’t like the possibility of being wrong…but that comes with being finite.